An agreement on the partition of the Hetmanate along the Dnipro between the Tsardom of Muscovy and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth without the participation of Ukrainians [1]. The legal entrenchment of Ukraine's split and the transformation of Zaporizhzhia into a buffer zone: "under the treaty of 1667 it was under the joint rule of Moscow and Warsaw"[2].
| ID | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| G0008 | Tsardom of Muscovy |
The logical culmination of the absorption process was the official partition of Ukrainian lands between the two neighboring states. The treaty was signed exclusively by representatives of Moscow and Warsaw: "On the Muscovite side the negotiations were conducted by... A. L. Ordin-Nashchokin... on the Polish side, by Commissar Jerzy Hlebowicz" [1]. The opinion of the autonomy itself was completely ignored: "The interests of the hetmans and of Ukraine were, of course, not taken into account" [3]. "For the Cossacks this is yet another blow — the decision about their fate is made behind their backs"[4]. |
| ID | Name | Use | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0030 | Administrative-Territorial Division |
The legal codification of the territory's division. Moscow deliberately fragmented a once unified country, turning such important regions as Zaporizhzhia into rightless buffer zones under joint administration: "...Zaporizhzhia (which under the treaty of 1667 was under the joint rule of Moscow and Warsaw)"[2]. |
|
| T0039 | Collusion with a Third Party |
The logical culmination of the absorption process was the official partition of Ukrainian lands between the two neighboring states. The treaty was signed exclusively by representatives of Moscow and Warsaw: "On the Muscovite side the negotiations were conducted by... A. L. Ordin-Nashchokin... on the Polish side, by Commissar Jerzy Hlebowicz" [1]. The opinion of the autonomy itself was completely ignored: "The interests of the hetmans and of Ukraine were, of course, not taken into account" [3]. "For the Cossacks this is yet another blow — the decision about their fate is made behind their backs"[4]. |
|
| T0008 | Deprivation of Agency |
In the legal partition of Ukrainian lands, the opinion of the people themselves or of their leaders was demonstratively ignored. The Hetmanate was treated exclusively as an object: "The interests of the hetmans and of Ukraine were, of course, not taken into account"[3]. |
|
| T0056 | Taxation |
Having gained political power over the Left Bank, Moscow immediately attempted to seize the right to collect taxes in order to extract resources directly: "the attempts of Russian voivodes... to introduce their own taxation system in Ukraine led only to revolts (for example... the attempted census of 1666...)"[2]. |
|
| ID | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| S0009 | Diplomacy |
The logical culmination of the absorption process was the official partition of Ukrainian lands between the two neighboring states. The treaty was signed exclusively by representatives of Moscow and Warsaw: "On the Muscovite side the negotiations were conducted by... A. L. Ordin-Nashchokin... on the Polish side, by Commissar Jerzy Hlebowicz" [1]. The opinion of the autonomy itself was completely ignored: "The interests of the hetmans and of Ukraine were, of course, not taken into account" [3]. "For the Cossacks this is yet another blow — the decision about their fate is made behind their backs"[4]. |
| S0008 | Government |
The legal codification of the territory's division. Moscow deliberately fragmented a once unified country, turning such important regions as Zaporizhzhia into rightless buffer zones under joint administration: "...Zaporizhzhia (which under the treaty of 1667 was under the joint rule of Moscow and Warsaw)"[2]. |